Federal Progressivity and State Regressivity∗

نویسنده

  • Esteban F. Klor
چکیده

This paper develops a positive theory of taxation in a federation of states. Its main motivation is to explain two facts about tax schedules in the US. The first one is that states’ income tax rates are relatively low compared to federal income tax rates, in most cases below 5%. The second one is that the overall effective tax schedule at the state level is regressive in every state. The results show that in a federal system, income inequality between states is the crucial variable determining the federal tax rate. In fact, a positive relation exists between the inequality level and the federal tax rate, even if the income of the decisive-voter is above the mean. In such a scenario, with endogenous incomes, states’ tax rates are relatively low because of incentives considerations, even if a relatively poor individual chooses this tax. Using a new data set on nonlinear tax schedules at the state level, empirical evidence is provided that supports the hypothesis of the paper. Most notably, the data points to the existence of a significant trade-off between the progressivity of the states and federal tax schedules, explained through income inequality between the states.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

WORKING PAPER A Distributional Analysis of an Environmental Tax Shift

I use data from the 1994 Consumer Expenditure Survey as well as other sources to measure the distributional impact of green tax reforms and consumption tax reforms using both annual income and lifetime income approaches to rank households. A modest tax reform in which environmental taxes equal to 10% of federal receipts are collected has a negligible impact on the income distribution when the f...

متن کامل

Equity and Distributional Issues in the Design of Environmental Tax Reform

Many politically active groups are looking to environmental tax reform (ETR)2 as they seek to solve environmental and social problems. The use of market mechanisms, rather than the more common “command and control” system of regulation (“thou shalt not . . .”), is becoming increasingly popular because it can be more efficient and offers greater flexibility. But since lower-income households spe...

متن کامل

Who Pays for Health Care? Progressivity of Health Finance

Who pays for health care? To what extent are payments toward health care related to ability to pay? Is the relationship proportional? Or is it progressive—do health care payments account for an increasing proportion of ability to pay (ATP) as the latter rises? Or, is there a regressive relationship, in the sense that payments comprise a decreasing share of ATP? The preferred relationship betwee...

متن کامل

The Long Run Effects of Changes in Tax

Working papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded offi cial Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views stated herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Ban...

متن کامل

Relative Affordability of Health Insurance Premiums under CHIP Expansion Programs and the ACA.

Affordability is integral to the success of health care reforms aimed at ensuring universal access to health insurance coverage, and affordability determinations have major policy and practical consequences. This article describes factors that influenced the determination of affordability benchmarks and premium-contribution requirements for Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) expansions ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001